Page path:

04.05.2012 Algal blooms in the North Sea

Nu­tri­ent sup­ply after algal bloom de­term­ines the suc­ces­sion of the bac­terial pop­u­la­tion
 
To most people, algal blooms are an an­noy­ance, which in­ter­feres with their sum­mer days by the sea. In the coastal zone of tem­per­ate re­gions a spring algal bloom is not a sign of ex­cess­ive nu­tri­ent in­put, but most of all a con­sequence of the more in­tense solar ir­ra­di­ation in spring (Fig­ure 1). Hence, spring algal blooms in these wa­ters are a nat­ural phe­nomenon (Fig­ure 2). When algal blooms end the al­gae die and their rem­nants con­sti­tute an im­port­ant nu­tri­ent sup­ply for the whole eco­sys­tem. This pro­cess is es­sen­tial e.g. for the off­shore abund­ance of fish. But what ex­actly hap­pens if an algal bloom ends? Hanno Teel­ing and Bernhard Fuchs and their col­leagues from the Max Planck In­sti­tute in Bre­men provide a sur­pris­ing and very de­tailed an­swer, along with their coau­thors from the Al­fred We­gener In­sti­tute for Mar­ine and Po­lar Re­search and the Uni­versity of Gre­if­swald. They ex­amined an algal bloom in the North Sea and were able to identify the role that the mi­croor­gan­isms play in the de­grad­a­tion of algal rem­nants and to gain in­sight into the de­grad­a­tion pro­cesses. And they dis­covered that some of these pro­cesses pro­ceed dif­fer­ently than hitherto as­sumed (Fig­ure 3). Their res­ults were just pub­lished in the journal Sci­ence.
Figure 1: The algae bloom in the German Bight spreads along the East and West Frisian coast. The satellite image from 2011 also shows the sediment discharge of the rivers Elbe and Weser that mix with the algae bloom. The island Helgoland is encircled in yellow. © NASA images courtesy Jeff Schmaltz, MODIS Rapid Response Team, Goddard Space Flight Center.
For their ana­lyses the sci­ent­ists fil­trated sev­eral hun­dreds of liters of sea­wa­ter on a reg­u­lar basis for al­most a year off the sta­tion ”Ka­beltonne”, a long-term sta­tion of the Bio­lo­gis­che An­stalt Hel­go­land that is part of the Al­fred We­gener In­sti­tute. Hanno Teel­ing from the Max Planck In­sti­tute says: “Pela­gic mi­croor­gan­isms, the so called bac­terioplank­ton, are crit­ical for the break­down of the dead algal bio­mass. Es­pe­cially the dy­namic suc­ces­sion in the bac­terioplank­ton caught our at­ten­tion. Spe­cial­ized bac­terial pop­u­la­tions ac­com­pany dif­fer­ent phases of the algal bloom”. Pro­cesses within the bac­terial pop­u­la­tion con­trol the de­grad­a­tion of the al­gae, as the sci­ent­ists could show.

His col­league Bernhard Fuchs who has been in­vest­ig­at­ing the di­versity and bac­terioplank­ton com­pos­i­tion for many years at the Max Planck In­sti­tute, adds: “For the first time we per­formed a high res­ol­u­tion ana­lysis of the mi­cro­bial com­munity at genus level. We could not only identify the bac­terial groups but also their func­tional tools, the en­zymes, that are in­volved in the break­down of the algal bloom”.
Figure 2: The chlorophyll a content - an indicator for the presence of algae in the water - increased from February (left) to April (right) in the year 2009, in which the samples were taken. At the beginning of April the algae bloom, which consisted mainly of diatoms, reached its maximum and was subsequently degraded. Helgoland is situated in the center of the bloom (black and red mark). © Giovanni online data system, developed and maintained by the NASA GES DISC
The sci­ent­ists used a novel com­bin­a­tion of tech­niques for their ana­lyses. They de­term­ined the iden­tity of the mi­croor­gan­isms by CARD-FISH, an in situ tech­no­logy that can be ap­plied dir­ectly to en­vir­on­mental samples (Fig­ure 4). Ad­di­tion­ally, they probed the bac­terial pop­u­la­tion dur­ing and after the algal bloom by short se­quences of a phylo­gen­etic marker gene (16S rRNA pyrotag ana­lyses). “By us­ing a com­bin­a­tion of meta­gen­ome and meta­pro­teome ana­lyses we suc­ceeded to de­tect the act­ive key en­zymes in com­plex en­vir­on­mental samples. This al­lows us to in­fer the role of the re­spect­ive bac­terial groups from their meta­bolic func­tion”, ex­plains Thomas Schweder from the Uni­versity of Gre­if­swald. “This was only pos­sibly by the com­puter-con­trolled in­teg­ra­tion of all data. For that task we used bioin­form­at­ics ”, as Frank Oliver Glöck­ner from the Max Planck In­sti­tute states. In the early phase of the algal bloom the sci­ent­ists en­countered a vari­ety of en­zymes for the de­grad­a­tion of com­plex algal car­bo­hydrates such as lam­in­arin. At a later stage trans­port pro­teins for pep­tides, short pro­tein units, and trans­port­ers for the growth lim­it­ing nu­tri­ent phos­phate and simple sugar com­pon­ents dom­in­ated the en­zymatic cock­tail. Note­worthy was the high por­tion of cer­tain trans­port pro­teins, the TonB-de­pend­ent trans­port­ers that can trans­port lar­ger mo­lecules dir­ectly into the in­terior of the cells. This dis­cov­ery may dis­prove the con­ven­tional ac­cept­ance that long-chained mo­lecules need to be broken up into smal­ler com­pon­ents be­fore the cell can take them up. The TonB-trans­porter may en­able the Fla­vobac­teria, one of the dom­in­at­ing bac­terial groups, to couple the as­sim­il­a­tion and de­grad­a­tion and thus to gain a com­pet­it­ive ad­vance to­wards other bac­terial groups. At the end of the bloom the bac­teria in­creas­ingly pro­duced sulfatases that cleave sulfate es­ters from al­gae car­bo­hydrates hard to de­com­pose and thus al­low the com­plete de­grad­a­tion of these sub­stances. Hence, the sci­ent­ists dis­covered a bac­terial pop­u­la­tion in the al­gae bloom that did not only dif­fer in its com­pos­i­tion but also in its func­tion from the bac­terial com­munity found in crys­tal clear, re­mote open wa­ters.
Figure 3: Scheme depicting the algae-bacteria interactions in spring 2009. It takes barely two month for the algae bloom to develop and to be degraded by a subsequent bacterioplankton bloom. The formation of the algae bloom is strongly triggered by the increasing solar radiation in spring. Not only bacteria, but also viruses and zooplankton participate in the degradation of the bloom. It is also the viruses and protozoa, which eventually terminate the bacterial bloom. © H. Teeling/R. Dunker
Figure 4: Flavobacteria (green) occur both free living and attached to microalgae in the North Sea. In this image some flavobacterial cells accumulated around a microalgae cell (chloroplasts in red). All other cells are shown in blue. The technique of Fluorescence in situ Hybridization that was used in this image allows for the staining and visualization of bacteria in the intact sample without the need of prior cultivation. © P. Gomez-Perreira/B. Fuchs
The res­ults of the study may help the sci­ent­ists to re­solve the so-called plank­ton para­dox: How can so many plank­ton spe­cies co­ex­ist in a seem­ingly ho­mo­gen­eous hab­itat without com­pet­ing for nu­tri­ents in a way that elim­in­ates cer­tain spe­cies? Rudolf Amann, Dir­ector of the Max Planck In­sti­tute ex­plains: ”The secret at the level of the mi­croor­gan­isms is the het­ero­gen­eity of the mi­croniches that the dif­fer­ent groups in­habit. Thus, the spe­cial­ized pop­u­la­tions com­ple­ment each other in the de­grad­a­tion of the or­ganic mat­ter.”

Rita Dunker

For further information please contact
Dr. Hanno Teel­ing ht­eel­ing@mpi-bre­men.de
Dr. Bernhard Fuchs bfuchs@mpi-bre­men.de
Prof. Dr. Rudolf Amann ramann@mpi-bre­men.de
Prof. Dr. Thomas Schweder schweder@uni-gre­if­swald.de

Or the public relation office
Rita Dunker rdunker@mpi-bre­men.de
Man­fred Schlösser mschloes@mpi-bre­men.de

Original article
Sub­strate-con­trolled suc­ces­sion of mar­ine bac­terioplank­ton pop­u­la­tions in­duced by a phyto­plank­ton blom, 2012. H. Teel­ing, B. M. Fuchs, D. Becher, C. Klockow, A. Gardebrecht, C. M. Bennke, M. Kassabgy, S. Huang, A. J. Mann, J. Wald­mann, M. Weber, A. Klind­worth, A. Otto, J. Lange, J. Bernhardt, C. Re­insch, M. Hecker, J. Peplies, F. D. Bock­el­mann, U. Cal­lies, G. Ger­dts, A. Wichels, K. H. Wilt­shire, F. O. Glöck­ner, T. Schweder, and R. Amann. Sci­ence, 336: 608-611.

Involved institutions
Max Planck In­sti­tute for Mar­ine Mi­cro­bi­o­logy, Bre­men

In­sti­tute of Mar­ine Bi­o­tech­no­logy e.V., Gre­if­swald

Jac­obs Uni­versity Bre­men, Bre­men

Al­fred We­gener In­sti­tute for Po­lar and Mar­ine Re­search, Bio­lo­gis­che An­stalt
Hel­go­land, Hel­go­land

In­sti­tute for Mi­cro­bi­o­logy, Ernst-Mor­itz-Arndt Uni­versity, Gre­if­swald

Phar­ma­ceut­ical Bi­o­tech­no­logy, Ernst-Mor­itz-Arndt Uni­versity, Gre­if­swald

DE­CODON GmbH, Gre­if­swald

Ri­bocon GmbH, 28359 Bre­men

Helm­holtz-Zen­trum Geesthacht, Cen­ter for Ma­ter­i­als and Coastal Re­search, Geesthacht
Back to Top