Web­lo­g6

Chief sci­en­tist leg 3
Ant­je Boe­ti­us
a.boe­ti­us.d at me­ri­an.brie­se-re­se­arch.de
Weblog 6
08.11.-11.11.

Problems and solutions

On Sun­day 8 No­vem­ber we star­ted with two gra­vi­ty co­res to ana­ly­ze the geo­che­mi­cal com­po­si­ti­on of the sub­sur­face fluids in the cen­ter of the mud vol­ca­no. We have to sol­ve an in­te­res­ting enig­ma that we en­coun­te­red du­ring sam­pling in 2006. In the cen­ter of the mud vol­ca­no we no­ted al­most per­fect con­di­ti­ons for an­ae­ro­bic hy­dro­c­ar­bon de­gra­ding mi­cro­bes: ab­un­dant che­mi­cal en­er­gy from depth ri­sing to­ge­ther with the sea­wa­ter salt con­sti­tu­ent sul­fa­te. Sul­fa­te can be used by mi­cro­bes for re­spi­ra­ti­on, to gain en­er­gy for bio­mass pro­duc­tion. But we were re­al­ly sur­pri­sed in 2006 to learn that the mi­cro­bes were not using the ab­un­dant en­er­gy sour­ce, and hence the hy­dro­c­ar­bons pas­sed to the over­ly­ing sea­wa­ter – alt­hough the­re was en­ough sul­fa­te ri­sing through the se­di­ments from a deep sour­ce. So we plan­ned a big ex­pe­ri­ment, to find out whe­ther the­re was so­me­thing in the fluids that would re­press mi­cro­bi­al ac­tivi­ty. The­re is one easy way to tell whe­ther mi­cro­bes are using sul­fa­te – it stinks. The was­te pro­duct of sul­fa­te re­spi­ra­ti­on is hy­dro­gen sul­fi­de, of which a few mole­cu­les are en­ough to let every one make a face. (The sul­fi­de stink is best known from rot­ting eggs.)
Gravity coring: We sample 6 m long cores from the seafloor. Source: Gabi Schüssler
Viola, Gabi and Christina preparing the core sample for the experiment. (G. Schüssler)
Sniffing sulfide – are the microbes active? (G. Schüssler)
Yes they are: after three years, the sulfide stench is unpleasantly obvious. (Source: Gabi Schüssler)
So what we found out is so­me­thing else: now, in 2009, the mi­cro­bes are as ac­tive as hell. Ob­vious­ly what we had sam­p­led in 2006 was a ma­jor new mud flow, whe­re mi­cro­bi­al com­mu­nities de­gra­ding hy­dro­c­ar­bons an­ae­ro­bi­cal­ly had sim­ply not yet de­ve­l­o­ped. Three ye­ars la­ter, they cer­tain­ly are, and every samp­le from the mud flow stinks of sul­fi­de. Enig­ma sol­ved.

Also on Sun­day the 8 No­vem­ber, we were trea­ted to a roy­al sur­pri­se lunch by our fa­bu­lous cook and his team. It re­al­ly felt like a Sun­day – at least du­ring lunch time. Du­ring the sci­en­ti­fic mee­ting - which ta­kes place every day at 3:30 pm to re­port on the most re­cent re­sults and to plan the next di­ves - we collec­ted all the re­mai­ning sci­en­ti­fic wis­hes till the end of the crui­se, and found out that we still have qui­te some work ahead of us, nee­ding a dive every day.

The af­ter­noon was spent on a short dive 246, to achie­ve a bet­ter map­ping of fla­res and as­so­cia­ted emis­si­ons from the seaf­loor, as well as car­ry­ing out a few more bio­geo­che­mi­cal mea­su­re­ments. Ever­y­thing worked re­al­ly gre­at till the ROV was re­co­ve­r­ed on deck short­ly be­fo­re mid­ni­ght. What a blow: We were all very disap­poin­ted to see that the ca­ble of the ROV was again twis­ted and now nee­ds a ma­jor re­pair.

So the next day (9 No­vem­ber) went by with Pa­ra­sound, Mul­ti­beam tran­sects, vi­deo­gui­ded mul­ti­co­rer sam­pling. Ever­yo­ne used the oc­ca­si­on to work up sam­ples. The ROV team was busy with steam­ing out the ca­ble to get rid of turns, with cut­ting the ca­ble and fi­xing a new plug, and fi­nal­ly ano­ther dive was plan­ned for the morning of the 10th No­vem­ber.
Sampling parties on deck. Petra, Viola and Christian are splitting meiofauna cores. (G. Schüssler)
Frank, Volker and Petra are preparing the lift . (G. Schüsssler)
Again, the dive 247 was a gre­at suc­cess. In less than 10 hours bot­tom time, we got 16 seaf­loor sam­ples, 3 wood logs from our ex­pe­ri­ments, a set of 3 suc­cess­ful in situ mea­su­re­ments, and in­te­res­ting ob­ser­va­tions on seaf­loor mor­pho­lo­gy and flu­id es­cape pa­thways. But then ano­ther shock: af­ter all the re­pai­ring, the ca­ble was again so ter­ri­b­ly twis­ted and tur­ned that we had to can­cel to­day’s dive, and to come up with a “Plan B”. The worst fee­ling is not to know the re­a­son for the­se ca­ble da­mages, and hence not being able to find im­me­dia­te so­lu­ti­ons. Se­cond co­mes the worry not to be able to fi­nish the tasks as ho­ped for, and as pre­pa­red for – de­s­pi­te the fact that the wea­ther is per­fect and the ROV too…ex­cept for its ca­ble.
Twisted… Issues with the Cable lead to short nights and long days for the ROV team. Source: Volker Ratmeyer
So we have a coup­le of op­ti­ons for ad­ap­t­ing the dive plans and the working hours to op­ti­mi­ze re­sults, even if we dive only every se­cond day. The ROV team is loo­king ca­re­ful­ly into each of the pro­ce­du­res of ROV de­ploy­ment, di­ving and re­co­very, to look for pos­si­ble sour­ces of im­pact on the ca­ble. Also we are tal­king to nu­merous ex­perts in­clu­ding the cap­tain and boats­wain of ME­RI­AN, to be sure not to miss an im­portant de­tail. We re­al­ly hope to find a so­lu­ti­on be­fo­re the end of the leg, be­cau­se the next leg is equal­ly de­pen­dent on dive time.

Me­anw­hi­le, the work con­ti­nues with gra­vi­ty co­res, map­ping and vi­deo-tran­sects using the fi­ber ca­ble of the ship. And just as I wri­te (11 No­vem­ber, 6 pm) the ROV team lea­der has in­for­med me that we can pre­pa­re for the next dive 248, which will al­low us to fi­nish one more task at the che­mo­syn­the­tic ha­bi­tats of the ou­ter mud flows. We will dive du­ring the night and come up to­mor­row morning (12 No­vem­ber), hope­ful­ly this time with an in­tact ca­ble. Wish us luck…


Antje Boetius
Back to Top